ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

On October 14, 2026, in Latest News, by The Somerville Times

(The opinions and views expressed in the commentaries and letters to the Editor of The Somerville Times belong solely to the authors and do not reflect the views or opinions of The Somerville Times, its staff, or publishers)

By Bill White
Former Somerville City Councilor for 24 years

Evidently, Mayor Wilson is continuing in his efforts to destroy our residential neighborhoods!  Already, developers can build buildings such as those shown in the photos as of right.  No one can deny that they cause the eviction of tenants, eliminate rental units and replace them with large luxury condominiums.  They create concrete jungles, provide almost no green space and are on top of next-door neighbors.

The Mayor has submitted zoning amendments to increase these backyards cottages to three stories in height with a total square footage of 1,750 feet.  Remember, these “cottages” can be built with no neighborhood input as of right, only 3 feet from your boundary line.  Look at the “cottage” in the photo.  Imagine the Mayor now wants this cottage to be the same height as the adjoining building.  What was troubling is that the Mayor’s staff represented that these changes were required “to align with state law.”  At the public hearing, there were a number of attorneys and people familiar with state law who established that state law does not require what the Mayor’s staff represented to the public was necessary “to align with state law.”  State law specifically requires that an accessory dwelling unit like our backyard cottage shall be no larger in Gross Floor Area than 1/2 the Gross Floor Area of the Principal Dwelling or 900 square feet, whichever is smaller. State law only therefore only requires 900 square feet for a “cottage!”  How did the Mayor get to 1,75 square feet?  Also, state law would require the “cottage” to be up to 3 stories tall, but only if it was located 20 feet from the rear property line, not 3 feet. Why didn’t Mayor’s staff mention that requirement?  These are questions we all should ask ourselves, and, perhaps the Mayor should ask his staff. Imagine the rear cottage shown in the photo at the same height as the two front buildings.

If you believe that these proposals by the Mayor go too far, you can send comments to the City Council and Planning Board at publiccomments@somervillema.gov by Friday October 30, 2026, and state your opposition.  Maybe you should consider sending a simple email to the Mayor’s office directly at  https://www.somervillema.gov/mayor and say ‘ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.’

 

4 Responses to “ENOUGH IS ENOUGH”

  1. Theirself says:

    Agreed. But this is not just on the mayors plate. This is our current governors plan to create affordable (allegedly) living space on bus routes. This is absolutely ruining the state from the East to the West. It is an utter disgrace, and the citizens of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts need to stand up to this ridiculous administration in Massachusetts.

  2. Chris Allen says:

    “No one can deny” and proceeds to list of a bunch of stuff that’s provably false from actual economic data. I get that you don’t like the vibes of it, but that’s a poor driver of municipal policy.

    Bill was always so reasonable when he was on the council, this sort of stuff is sad to see.

  3. William White says:

    Hello Chris, maybe it is just me, but I think most people would have found your comment more valuable if you mentioned a source that disproved my statement. For folks who are familiar with my work as a councilor, I always did my homework to support my conclusions. If folks are interested in one of my sources, they can go to
    https://dls-gw.dor.state.ma.us/reports/rdPage.aspx?rdReport=PropertyTaxInformation.LA4.Parcel_counts_vals
    and key in on Somerville. If, after reviewing the Somerville statistics, you disagree with my conclusion, kindly post and we can have a discussion that folks might find interesting.

  4. Jared 27 Rossmore says:

    The era of looking out your bedroom window over the rolling hills of Somerville, while birds chirp and cats paw lazily on porches in the midday sun, has not been seen ’round these parts for the past 35 years or so.

    The birds? Torn asunder by hawks.
    The cats? Conceded porches to the rats.

    Stuff on other people’s property is getting taller.

    And closer to Their Side of the Line.

    One wonders: Where *exactly* outside your private property would you like your aesthetic preferences to start being enforced by State-wielded firearms and taxation powers?

    “Twenty to thirty feet back from the line”?
    W h y w o u l d I c a r e a b o u t t h a t ?

    On the other hand, it’s impossible to ask Bill to go “touch grass” because you can’t grow grass in a yard if there’s a giant f’ing ADU blocking all the sunlight back there. The man has a point.

    Can we talk about how only ultra-wealthy or pro-developers can actually afford to Build Anything right now, whatever the zoning says?

Leave a Reply

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.