By Anna Schaeffer

The Somerville City Council gathered on Thursday night, January 23, for its usual meeting to discuss matters of legislative and public concern.

The meeting began with a moment of silence in remembrance of Catherine B. Canaan who passed away on January 18. A math teacher who was deeply involved in the Somerville community, Canaan used her retirement to actively pursue the Somerville Math Fund and manage state education assessment examinations.

Requests to confirm two individuals to the position of firefighter were both approved and the two were sworn in shortly thereafter. Randy Oliver will be bringing tech repair skills to the Somerville Fire Department. He has worked as a service repair technician at Toyota since 2005, is a graduate of Minuteman Regional High School in Lexington, and is a father of two. He will be following the path of his uncle, who was a Cambridge firefighter. He will begin his duties effective February third.

The other candidate approved for the position of firefighter was Daniel Roach, who has an associate’s degree in criminal justice and is an active volunteer in the Somerville community. Roach was inspired by his high school coach who was also a firefighter and followed in his footsteps by pursuing his career with the fire department.

In other business, the Council approved a grant of location submitted by Eversource Energy to install ten feet of conduit on Ivaloo Street. Concerns about the unstable state of the utility pole raised by Ward 2 Councilor J.T. Scott were acknowledged by Stephanie Hirsch, who affirmed that the leaning pole would be replaced and overhanging branches will be trimmed appropriately.

In response to concerns about public participation, Ward 6 Councilor Lance Davis proposed that childcare services be provided for members of the Somerville community who wish to attend meetings. Meetings of the City Council normally take place in the evenings, which makes attendance difficult for people with children. The item was approved in hopes of stimulating public engagement with the city council and municipal government.

In Somerville, seniors who wish to qualify for tax exemption must meet the $60,000 threshold of assets to be approved. Ward 1 Councilor and Council President Mathew McLaughlin proposed that the limit on assets for seniors be raised. Citing a conversation he had with a community member, McLaughlin argued that “The $60,000 threshold of assets that a senior must have to qualify for tax exemption is basically a medical bill away from being broke.” The proposal was approved.

The Council also approved a measure stating that January 31, 2020, shall be proclaimed Volunteer Income Tax Assistance and Earned Income Tax Credit Day.

Also approved was a request to add “Not a thru street” signage on Chester Avenue while construction takes place.

The Tenant Notification Act, which was approved earlier this year, requires landlords to provide information about legal rights to their tenants. However, the efficacy of this was questioned and a request to send a citywide mailer about the act to Somerville residents was made by Ward 3 Councilor Ben Ewen-Campen. This request was approved.

Other proposals regarding pedestrian safety infrastructure, public space enrichment, and worker-owned co-ops were also approved.

 

2 Responses to “Proposals for childcare and senior tax exemption approved by City Council”

  1. LindaS says:

    They apparently think that all seniors are wealthy and living the good life. Raising the asset limit is an insult to all of those people who worked hard for the majority of their lives and only managed to save enough to help in hard times, or maybe didn’t manage to save anything at all.

    Considering how many people today work more than one job just to keep their head above water, I feel for them when they become seniors. They may not even get to retire, much less have enough to survive on.

    The city probably complains about older folks who don’t fix their property, but don’t give those same folks a break when they can’t afford to do so. “One medical bill away from being broke”? Is that all you think seniors have to worry about? What about monthly bills? What about property taxes?

    Oh, of course, seniors can work for free to earn a break on A PART of their property taxes. Sure. Because seniors hated retirement, and worked for the hope that someday they’d get to work some more for the privilege of getting part of their taxes reduced. What am I thinking?

    The city should be doing more to keep the people who have been here long-term, instead of just making it harder for us to stay here.

  2. Seniors Live Here Too says:

    There are going to be problems when you begin to prioritize one group over another. Are parents of young children the only group who has difficulty attending meetings in the evening? What about elderly who don’t have transportation? What about anyone who lacks transportation? What about those who work all day then care for an elderly or ill family member, or work a second job at night? Child care might bring younger citizens into meetings, but will do nothing for the forgotten and marginalized elderly and disabled citizens. Of course, the elderly probably can’t come because they will have become indentured servants to the city, in order to pay their outrageous tax bill for the pleasure of living here, only to be ignored by said city.