The hidden issue of underemployment

On June 14, 2019, in Latest News, by The Somerville Times

(The opinions and views expressed in the commentaries and letters to the Editor of The Somerville Times belong solely to the authors and do not reflect the views or opinions of The Somerville Times, its staff or publishers.)

By Joseph A. Curtatone

 When thinking about the economy, many of us look to the unemployment rate as a measure of how we’re doing. The unemployment rate has been on a steady decline since the recession and is now about 3.6% nationally, and about 1.7% in Somerville. On the surface, that looks great, but unemployment numbers don’t capture the growing problem of underemployment.

Underemployment is a broad term that includes a few categories of workers. People who work part-time but would like to work full-time, people in jobs they are over-qualified for, people in temporary jobs, and people making less than expected based on their education or experience are all considered underemployed.

Underemployment is harder to track than unemployment, but there are some numbers out there that help illustrate the magnitude of the problem. Last year NPR reported that around 33 percent of college graduates are underemployed while the Washington Post put the figure at 43 percent. In Massachusetts, we know one in six workers has a job beneath their skill level and that the number of underemployed workers has risen from about 70,000 in 2007 to more than 100,000 in 2019. Statistics also show that the number of underemployed seniors who are still working is also rising. It’s important that we continue to get a better understanding of underemployment and how, we, as a community, can help local workers out of it, because underemployment has serious long-term economic impacts. Because underemployment can take several forms, the long-term effects also can vary based on each worker’s situation. Here are a couple of examples of how people can be hurt by underemployment in both their personal and professional lives:

Someone working part-time or cobbling together full-time hours from a few part-time jobs likely won’t receive the same benefits as a full-time employee, including health insurance, sick days, or paid vacation—or even bank holidays. That means higher costs for health insurance and having to choose between staying home when sick or taking needed time off, or losing a day’s pay, which can trigger a domino effect. When someone has to pay more for health insurance and loses wages when they take a day off, they have less money for housing, food, medical care, transportation, and other expenses. They also may be paying more for transportation – rather than one commute to and from one job, an underemployed worker could be making two or three commutes between jobs in a day.

Underemployment has also been shown to slow career progression and earnings growth. Studies have found that many workers who begin their careers underemployed are still employed below their potential five and even 10 years later. And, unfortunately, this is a problem that disproportionately affects women and people of color. Along with not getting the additional work experience and opportunity to learn new skills that often comes with career advancement, people stuck in underemployment don’t see the accompanying salary increases that come with moving up the ladder. Again, this sets off a domino effect. Workers whose careers and earnings have stagnated will have a harder time doing things like affording rent increases, buying a home, having children, or saving for emergencies or retirement.

If you’ve read any of the many “millennials are killing X industry” articles that have been published, you also know that underemployment shapes consumer behavior and the larger economy. Someone who is having a hard time making ends meet or doesn’t know when their next freelance check is coming in is less like to go out to eat, go shopping, or buy tickets to a concert or play.

Unfortunately, like many of the big challenges we face, there’s not an easy solution to underemployment. But that doesn’t mean there’s nothing we can do.

The City’s Economic Development Division works on a number of programs to both bring jobs to Somerville and to make sure that Somerville residents are prepared to fill those jobs. We do this because neither our new high school graduates, our active local workers, our young professionals, our mid-career workers, nor our seniors, should have to face underemployment.

On the job recruitment side, the City’s Economic Development team regularly does outreach to promote Somerville to large employers like Partners HealthCare or Philips as well as small, local independent businesses. Their site finder tool can also help business owners who want to open or expand a business in Somerville find the right property for their needs. They hold workshops and open houses in multiple languages where prospective business owners can learn more about the process of opening up. Our Small Business Support program pairs local businesses with business coaches who advise on topics like financial planning, writing a business plan, and marketing and offers grants to fund those efforts. In SomerVision, the community set a goal of bringing 30,000 new jobs into Somerville, and each of these programs helps us get closer to that goal.

Making sure there are jobs in Somerville is important, but so is making sure employees have the skills and education needed for those jobs. Through our Skill Up Somerville program, adults can take advantage of skill development programs, including social media, coding, and fabrication, that will help prepare them to find a job or advance their career. Somerville was also one of the first municipalities in the state to establish a jobs linkage fund, which helps with the cost of job training efforts. Money for the fund comes in through a fee paid by developers of commercial projects over 15,000 square feet.

As a large employer in Somerville, the City also has a part to play. A $15 per hour living wage was recently passed for all part-time staff, and this past year we settled five union contracts that now include wage growth  even when the union is out of contract

During the recession, shifting jobs to part-time or contract positions was a way to keep more people in jobs. But now this short-term fix has created long-term problems for many workers and we, as a community, must look at strategies to get people out of underemployment and headed toward greater opportunities. We don’t just want 30,000 new jobs. We want to be sure 30,000 people are fully employed in them.

 

7 Responses to “The hidden issue of underemployment”

  1. Ben Bradlow says:

    The single greatest predictor of low undermployment is high unionization. We need employers that are supportive of worker organizations. Are the large employers unionized? Are the small employers achieving high-road standards? Casualization, wage-theft, needing to work multiple jobs to get by and get benefits that should be rights… all of these are evidence of a city that is not friendly to unions. One job should be enough!

  2. Kate says:

    So says ben bradlow who probably never held a full time job in his life. He and his underemployed-by-choice friends will tell everyone else what’s good for them.

    Take a trip to the rust belt see what happens to good hard working union members when ideologically driven organizers take charge.

  3. Johnny says:

    tell us about your experience as a working man, Ben.

  4. Jess Turner says:

    Here is my personal opinion: Unionizing has nothing to do with it, Mr. PHD candidate Bradlow. The same Bradlow who fought against our Clarendon project to promote the selfishness of the union on the backs of the most vulnerable community in Somerville. The same person who is so overly educated and book smart that he panders to the same people who fight for $15 an hour minimum wage which is absolutely HORRIBLE or does NOTHING for those on income based social programs. His head is so far up union lobbyists asses that he cannot even see the whole picture. I dont even know if he ever saw the whole picture. But he surely doesn’t get it. And I’m fed up with his virtue signaling on race, making everything about race when in reality we poor people know that is not the issue.

    Where is the motivation to be successful and earn more by actually working hard to get to a higher position? Not with Mr. Bradlow’s unionization idea. Holding companies hostage over benefits that dont actually benefit anyone else or build a person up to self-sufficiency is not the way to do it. It has NOTHING to do with “unionizing”. It has to do with opportunity, achievement, motivation and wanting to be better. Feeling better. Don’t speak on what can help poor people please, Mr. Bradlow. Mr. Bradlow honestly doesn’t know a damn thing about us. His ideas are bad because he doesn’t get it. Just like he didn’t get Clarendon. Or maybe he did and had ulterior motives. Only God knows that. But we know that he did not care about Clarendon. And his obsession with the union caused him to fight for them instead of us bottom 1%’ers (who also work and pay taxes) by ignoring us. Mr. Bradlow was nowhere to be found.

    Unionization does not create jobs. It creates money for unions who do not want us living near their homes, in their cities, or even in healthy homes. All they care about is their overpaid prevailing wages, at $60/hour, and on the backs of poor people it is their way or the highway. Keep advocating for unions. All it does is continue to prove what your ulterior motives are and who is supporting you, Mr. Bradlow.

    Mayor Curtatone gets it. He stood up for us Clarendon residents. Unfortunately, even a person with PHD criteria, overly educated and wealthy, like Mr. Bradlow, does not. Why? Probably because Mayor actually listens to us, without only using any preformed narrative or agenda only found in a sociology book. He hears us, sees us, listens. To individuals, Ben. Real people, you know, in the real world. Ben doesn’t listen. So sad. So snobby. Keep your union agenda, Mr. Bradlow. We don’t want it. We want opportunity.

  5. Will Scarlet says:

    So tell it to our municipal workers who’ve been forced to spend thousands of dollars on grievances due to the Curtatone Administration’s failure to bargain in good faith, that unions don’t matter. Joe Curtatone is a union buster who’d like to privatize public works projects through the bogus “public-private partnerships” scam, pushed by Charlie Baker and his Privateers.

    Some of these postings smack of pro-development sour-grape.s. Unions protect our workers, who also struggle to stay in the Ville. Unions have given us the eight-hour day, weekends, job safety and the right to bargain with management. Won with blood and struggle, not handed to American workers by management.

    At least Ben Bradlow volunteers without pay, as an elected board member of the Union Square Neighborhood Council, to negotiate with Union Square developer US2 for badly-needed community benefits. Or do you think US2 and City Hall would’ve just handed these to us?

  6. Highlander says:

    Ben and his union bosses have delayed the largest affordable housing project in Somerville’s history by over a year, all because they wanted 100% union labor instead of 75%. Let’s hope they don’t kill the project altogether, leaving poor families and seniors living in decrepit conditions. It’s become clear that affordable housing is not his number one priority, but lining the pockets of trade union bosses. Any guesses what is holding up the Union Square negotiations? Hard to believe half of the City Council is beholden to these crooks and Ivy League posers. Their hand is in the cookie jar, and we’re supposed to all look the other way.

  7. Jess Turner says:

    Union hate poor people and use us as their personal stepping stool to keep poor people poor.