Volume 41-Report No. 28 • July 11-15, 2016
Copyright © 2016 Beacon Hill Roll Call. All Rights Reserved. By Bob Katzen

Our Legislators in the House and Senate for Somerville:

barber_webRep. Christine Barber
DISTRICT REPRESENTED: Thirty-fourth Middlesex. – Consisting of all precincts in wards 4 and 5, precinct 1 of ward 7, and precinct 2 of ward 8, of the city of Medford, precincts 1 and 2 of ward 4, and all precincts of ward 7, of the city of Somerville, both in the county of Middlesex.

Rep. Denise Provost
DISTRICT REPRESENTED: Twenty-seventh Middlesex. – Consisting of precinct 3 of ward 2, all precincts of ward 3, precinct 3 of ward 4, and all precincts of wards 5 and 6, of the city of Somerville, in the county of Middlesex.

Rep. Timothy Toomey
DISTRICT REPRESENTED: Twenty-sixth Middlesex. – Consisting of all precincts of ward 1, precinct 1 of ward 2, precincts 1 and 2 of ward 3, and precinct 1 of ward 6, of the city of Cambridge, and all precincts of ward 1 and precincts 1 and 2 of ward 2, of the city of Somerville, both in the county of Middlesex.

Sen. Patricia Jehlen
DISTRICT REPRESENTED: Second Middlesex. – Consisting of the cities of Cambridge, wards 9 to 11, inclusive, Medford and Somerville, and the town of Winchester, precincts 4 to 7, inclusive, in the county of Middlesex.

*THE HOUSE AND SENATE: Beacon Hill Roll Call records local senators’ and representatives’ votes on roll calls from the week of July 11-15.

House 158-0, approved a bill that would strengthen the Bay State’s pay equity law by closing the wage gap between men and women doing the same job. The measure requires that women be paid equal pay for comparable work unless the variation is based upon mitigating factors including seniority; a system that measures earnings by quantity or quality of production, sales or revenue; and education, training or experience.

The proposal establishes pay transparency, prohibits screening of prospective employees based on salary history, requires fairness in hiring practices and increases fines for violations.  Other provisions prohibit employers from reducing salaries in order to comply with the new law and from preventing employees from talking about their salaries.

Supporters said it is far past time to approve this historic bill and noted women comprise 50 percent of the workforce yet make only 80 cents for every dollar earned by men.

The Senate has approved a different version of the bill and a House-Senate conference committee will hammer out a compromise version.

(A “Yes” vote is for the bill.)

Rep. Christine Barber     Yes
Rep. Denise Provost        Yes
Rep. Timothy Toomey    Yes

Senate 38-2, approved and sent to the House a bill to prevent wage theft by employers. Wage theft includes paying below the minimum wage, neglecting to pay overtime and paying workers in cash to avoid paying taxes. Key provisions of the proposal make companies that contract with a subcontractor that withholds wages liable for those wages, and give the attorney general the power to shut down a company within 96 hours if a wage theft violation is found and left uncorrected.

Supporters there are $700 million of wages stolen annually in Massachusetts from about 350,000 workers. They argued it is time to crack down on businesses that cheat their hard working employees and to hold employers accountable for these illegal practices.

Opponents said the bill unfairly punishes unknowing contractors for the illegal actions of their subcontractors. They said it is unfair and anti-business to require companies to police the payroll of their subcontractors.

(A “Yes” vote is for the bill. A “No” vote is against it.)

Sen. Patricia Jehlen    Yes

Senate 34-6, approved an amendment giving “angel investors” a state tax credit equal to 20 percent of the amount of the investment they make in a qualifying business. In order to qualify, the business must have its principal place of business in the Bay State, have at least 50 percent of its employees located in the business’s principal place of business, employ 20 or fewer full-time employees and have gross revenues equal to or less than $500,000. The tax credit rises to 30 percent if the business is located in one of the state’s struggling cities, known as gateway cities.

Amendment supporters said this will encourage investment in small companies that seek startup and expansion capital. They argued it will stimulate the economy and create jobs and is a win-win for investors and the small businesses.

Amendment opponents said the state should not be giving tax breaks to wealthy investors.

(A “Yes” vote is for the tax credit. A “No” vote is against it.)

Sen. Patricia Jehlen    No

Senate 39-0, approved and sent to the House a bill that would restrict employers from requiring credit checks of potential and current employees. The measure permits credit checks under limited circumstances including if the applicant or employee applies for or holds an executive or managerial position at a financial institution or a position that requires national security clearance.

Supporters said 43 percent of U.S. employers look at a person’s credit history and argued a credit report should not have any effect on whether someone gets hired or promoted.

Although no one voted against the bill, critics say that the restriction would hurt small businesses who are looking for the best employees.

(A “Yes” vote is for the bill.)

Sen. Patricia Jehlen    Yes

Senate 40-0, approved a lengthy bill aimed at modernizing municipal finance and government. The bill updates or outright repeals several archaic laws and creates a new law allowing communities to issue driver citations electronically.  Many provisions in the bill are technical and the measure has been called “the most boring weed-whacking stuff you ever saw in your life,” by Gov. Charlie Baker.

The proposal gives municipalities more control over local funding decisions, local regulations and the issuing of local liquor licenses, as well as the option to enter into joint powers agreements to provide services regionally.

Supporters said the bill removes some obsolete state laws and updates others to help government be more efficient at the local level by enhancing the delivery of services and promoting regional cooperation among neighboring communities. They noted the measure is supported by the Massachusetts Municipal Association, an entity that lobbies for the state’s cities and towns.

The House has approved a different version of the bill and a House-Senate conference committee will likely hammer out a compromise version.

(A “Yes” vote is for the bill.)

Sen. Patricia Jehlen    Yes

Senate 33-7 approved an amendment giving cities and towns an option to levy a local payroll, sales, property or vehicle excise tax to pay for local transportation costs including maintaining, repairing and building roads, bridges, bikeways and pedestrian pathways, as well as making improvements in public transportation and transit systems. The tax would have to be approved by a city council or selectmen, and then by local voters on a ballot.

Amendment supporters said this allows, but does not force cities and towns to raise taxes to pay for vital improvements to their crumbling infrastructure and public transportation.

Amendment opponents said this is nothing more than another unwarranted tax on already overburdened taxpayers.

(“Yes” vote is for allowing cities and towns to raise taxes. A “No” vote is against allowing it.)

Sen. Patricia Jehlen    Yes



ALLOW MORE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS (S 542) – The House and Senate approved and sent to Gov. Baker a proposal that would allow donors to contribute the maximum $1,000 twice per year to a candidate who runs for the Legislature in a special election and a regular election in the same year. Current law only allows donors to give a maximum of $1,000 in any calendar year.

BALLOT QUESTIONS ARE ASSIGNED NUMBERS –  The four questions that will be on the November ballot have been assigned numbers by Secretary of State Bill Galvin. The four questions are: 1. Allowing one more slot parlor with 1,250 machines to be built near Suffolk Downs; 2. Allowing the state to open up to 12 new charter schools annually; 3. Prohibiting any farmers from confining any pigs, calves or hens in a way that prevents the animal from lying down, standing up, fully extending its limbs or turning around freely; and 4. legalizing, licensing, regulating and taxing the sale of marijuana for adults over 21.


Beacon Hill Roll Call tracks the length of time that the House and Senate were in session each week. Many legislators say that legislative sessions are only one aspect of the Legislature’s job and that a lot of important work is done outside of the House and Senate chambers. They note that their jobs also involve committee work, research, constituent work and other matters that are important to their districts. Critics say that the Legislature does not meet regularly or long enough to debate and vote in public view on the thousands of pieces of legislation that have been filed. They note that the infrequency and brief length of sessions are misguided and lead to irresponsible late night sessions and a mad rush to act on dozens of bills in the days immediately preceding the end of an annual session. During the week of July 11-15, the House met for a total of nine hours and 11 minutes and the Senate met for a total of 30 hours and eight minutes.

Mon. July 11
House 11:05 a.m. to 11:18 a.m.
Senate 11:07 a.m. to 2:06 p.m.

Tues. July 12
No House session
Senate 11:04 a.m. to 6:20 p.m.

Wed. July 13
House 12:02 a.m. to 1:14 p.m.
Senate 11:03 a.m. to 6:54 p.m.

Thurs. July 14
House 11:02 a.m. to 6:48 p.m.
Senate 11:37 a.m. to 11:08 p.m.

Fri. July 15
No House session
Senate 1:05 p.m. to 1:36 p.m.


Bob Katzen welcomes feedback at bob@beaconhillrollcall.com